>NEW: Info to the keyword was | >discuss | >create link 
on Aug 27th 2006, 10:25:16, ginea wrote the following about

was

Has there to be an intension? By chance I came into the blaster, and I cotinue. The word who brought me here was schizoaffektiv and thats what I am when I belief is jo wurscht, i schau jetzt ned noch wia ma das schreibt. the buisness of literature is to oppose the commercialized current of civilisation, not sail with it. we talk of the»one for all and all for oneIn fact, all the society is not for the one writer, even when he were a stone. It only expects the one writer to be for the wholsociety. So let me be a stone and let me write for fun, for excitement, to enjoy meyself, at least. I prefer granit.


   user rating: /
Can you think about the opposite of »was«? Write down how it works!

Your name:
Your Associativity to »was«:
Do NOT enter anything here:
Do NOT change this input field:
 Configuration | Web-Blaster | Statistics | »was« | FAQ | Home Page 
0.0035 (0.0012, 0.0011) sek. –– 128664293