Orpheus wrote on Jan 12th 2006, 04:30:55 about
universe
Rating: 12 point(s) | Read and rate text individuallySome people say the universe is curved. This means that if you travel far enough, you will eventually catch up with yourself.
| Amount of texts to »universe« | 75, and there are 71 texts (94.67%) with a rating above the adjusted level (-3) |
| Average lenght of texts | 180 Characters |
| Average Rating | 2.480 points, 2 Not rated texts |
| First text | on Apr 11th 2000, 10:07:38 wrote Galaxie about universe |
| Latest text | on Jan 14th 2011, 09:26:30 wrote Emma Example about universe |
| Some texts that have not been rated at all
(overall: 2) |
on Jan 14th 2011, 09:26:30 wrote
on Jan 14th 2011, 09:25:58 wrote |
Random associativity, rated above-average positively
Texts to »Universe«
quetzalcoatl wrote on Mar 4th 2001, 03:16:00 about
universe
Rating: 20 point(s) | Read and rate text individuallyWhat few understand is that if the universe is expanding...into where is it expanding?
Emma Example wrote on Dec 21st 2000, 00:52:05 about
universe
Rating: 14 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
pity this busy monster, manunkind,
not. Progress is a comfortable disease:
your victim (death and life safely beyond)
plays with the bigness of his littleness
- electrons deify one razorblade
into a mountainrange; lenses extend
unwish through curving wherewhen till unwish
returns on its unself.
A world of made
is not a world of born – pity poor flesh
and trees, poor stars and stones, but never this
fine specimen of hypermagical
ultraomnipotence. We doctors know
a hopeless case if – listen: there's a hell
of a good universe next door; let's go
-- e. e. cummings
OverlordQ wrote on Sep 24th 2001, 05:27:59 about
universe
Rating: 15 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
whatevernext96 wrote on Nov 18th 2001, 17:22:20 about
universe
Rating: 9 point(s) | Read and rate text individuallyI was very glad to learn a few seconds ago that scientists have begun to think of our universe in terms of fruit. However, I'm not too happy with the actual 'first fruits' of this research trend. Why does the universe have to be the size of a not too cheery grapefruit just after Big Bang? Such fiddly fruit – they always need sugar and take ages to open up. Or was that God's metaphor for the human species?
whatevernext96 wrote on Sep 22nd 2001, 17:20:59 about
universe
Rating: 11 point(s) | Read and rate text individuallySpeak for yourself – I shall have much better things to do in the Universe than worrying about where to keep all my stuff. Indeed, I'm looking forward to being entirely without mass and weightless – free at last of all the heavy burdens of gravity....
john wrote on Dec 4th 2001, 11:46:57 about
universe
Rating: 8 point(s) | Read and rate text individuallyeverything , including you , me and the computer you're sitting at right now
the old pirate wrote on Mar 26th 2001, 05:53:42 about
universe
Rating: 4 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
Scientists who estimate such things have estimated that, at 10 to the minus 32nd of a second after the Big Bang, the universe was the size of a grapefruit.
(I'm not making this up.)
tarquill wrote on May 26th 2001, 14:38:13 about
universe
Rating: 6 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
the universe is endless, and controlled by aliens. Ever seen MiB only those would understand
| Some random keywords |
wildflower
universe
Murphy
poopchute
2
|
| Some random keywords in the german Blaster |
Sportlehrerin
Caro
Tascherlfon
DerSagenumwobeneKelchderKotze712
Sol-Geborene
|