Gil wrote on Jan 16th 2002, 13:34:35 about
do
Rating: 10 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
Do this, do that, I always have to do something. Maybe someday I will not have to do anyhting.
| Amount of texts to »do« | 50, and there are 47 texts (94.00%) with a rating above the adjusted level (-3) |
| Average lenght of texts | 110 Characters |
| Average Rating | 7.100 points, 13 Not rated texts |
| First text | on Jun 12th 2000, 11:37:37 wrote don't about do |
| Latest text | on Jan 5th 2007, 04:53:22 wrote mairead about do |
| Some texts that have not been rated at all
(overall: 13) |
on Apr 5th 2001, 23:14:57 wrote
on May 5th 2002, 02:48:56 wrote
on Apr 12th 2001, 17:08:33 wrote |
Random associativity, rated above-average positively
Texts to »Do«
note wrote on Aug 10th 2004, 00:31:53 about
do
Rating: 21 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
don't wrote on Jun 12th 2000, 11:37:37 about
do
Rating: 11 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
the Masters of Associativity recommend:
Avoid to create a keyword from very common but quite meaningless words like »the« or »a« – until you have something really good to write about it.
Okay, but here's the thing – where would langage be without all these gluing words? there wouldn't be much meaning, or at least not much without them.
do, is one half of i do – the wedding vow – tell me that that it has no power? no meaning? no place in this blaster?
also, what has being particularly good got to do with validity in this thing – not only is good or bad subjective – but it is also sorely lacking, in my opinion. With free reign people can make any association positive or negative – it doesn't have anything to do with quality or just popularlity, or whim.
i say, let the associations run free, or put some stronger criterion on what you expect – because a lot of what goes on in here is drivel – which is okay if you expect it – also, it makes the gems shine brighter.
there's sense,
and then there's sensibility.
just because its ubiquitous doesn't make it unimportant
quite the contrary, it think
Aunt Mabel wrote on May 9th 2001, 21:43:00 about
do
Rating: 266 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
BobbyCordial wrote on Feb 26th 2002, 20:49:43 about
do
Rating: 7 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
rkcba wrote on Nov 21st 2003, 20:10:29 about
do
Rating: 7 point(s) | Read and rate text individually| Some random keywords |
run
among
CIGAR
guard
out-of-date
|
| Some random keywords in the german Blaster |
Elektronegativität
Kollateralschadensersatz
einem-nackten-Mann-den-Finger-in-den-Mund-stecken
Bundfaltenjeans
geliked
Assoziationsfetzen
|